SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18422

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND REVIEWING AUTHORITY BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SRI G RAMAKRISHNAN – Respondent


CAV JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO)

This Writ Appeal is filed by the appellant/employer-Bank challenging the Judgment dated 13.10.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.4550/2022 (S-RES). The respondent herein had prayed as under in W.P.No.4550/2022, To quash the order ref No.BZO/HRD/PSV/2021-22/989 dated 17.09.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent (ANNEXURE-A) herein and consequently direct the respondents to release my Promotion w.e.f. 01.04.2013 and direct the respondents to implement the Joint Compromise Memo dated: 21.03.2016 (Annexure-F) filed in Writ Appeal No.2406/2015(S-R) on the file of this Hon’ble Court dated 31/03/2016(Annexure-G) and pass such further or other orders which may deem fit in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

2. The appellants herein are respondents in the writ petition and the respondent herein is the petitioner in the writ petition.

3. The impugned Judgment passed by the learned Single Judge reads as under:

The respondents are, therefore, directed to grant the petitioner promotions to Middle Management Grade Scale-II with effect from 01.04.2013 and all consequential benefits thereof, and pay the same to the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top