Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K V ARAVIND, J
SHRI. BASAVANT S/O. SOMAPPA HOSUR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts leading to the conviction under mv act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and conviction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. ratio behind modifying the sentence. (Para 10) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND)
Heard Sri Sajid Ahmed Goodwala, learned counsel appearing along with Sri Jagadish Patil for the petitioner- accused, and Sri T. Hanumareddy, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent-State.
2. This criminal revision petition is filed by the accused challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 13.08.2020 passed in C.C. No.418/2015 by the Court of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Kittur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), and the judgment and order dated 08.04.2021 passed in Criminal Appeal No.181/2020 by the XI Additional Sessions Judge, Belagavi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the appellate Court’).
3. The case of the prosecution is that on
08.06.2013 at about 2:30 p.m., near Kadatnal Village, the accused was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-22/J-3978 along with a pillion rider. He is alleged to have ridden the motorcycle in a rash and negligent manner,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
