Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
C M JOSHI, J
M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SRI C VINAYAPRASAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal overview and accident details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute over insurance policy cancellation. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. tribunal's reliance on presented evidence. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. arguments regarding communication and liability. (Para 8 , 9) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI)
2. The factual matrix that is relevant for the purpose of this appeal are that, the petitioner while was walking near railway station at Pandavapura, on 12.06.2015 at about 9.10 a.m., met with an accident when the car bearing No. TN.34.S.9509 dashed against him. He was shifted to the hospital for the grievous injuries sustained by him and had to suffer the injuries. Alleging that the accident was due to the rash and negligent driving of the car driver, and that the car was insured with the appellant-insurance company, petitioner filed a claim petition for compensation.
Therefore, alleging that the owner of the vehicle was very well aware of the cancellation of the policy and as such, there being no such contract subsisting between the Insurance Company and the owner as on date of the accident dated 12.6.2015, the Insurance Company sought exonerating it from any liability.
5. After hearing the argu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
