KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
SRI. SOUNDARARAJAN SUBRAMANI – Appellant
Versus
SRI.R.NILAKANTAN IYER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of lease agreement and tenant's obligations. (Para 4) |
| 2. establishment of grounds for ejectment. (Para 6) |
| 3. legal nature of tenancy under statutory provisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's reasoning and affirmation of trial court decision. (Para 14) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
The captioned appeal is by the defendant assailing the ejectment order passed in O.S.No.3530/2024.
2. For the sake of brevity, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.
3. The facts leading to the case are as under:
The plaintiff claims to have leased out the suit premises, Flat No. A-1401, to the defendant under a rental agreement dated 21.08.2023, for a fixed term of 11 months commencing from 19.08.2023. The plaintiff acknowledges having delivered possession of the flat to the defendant. As per the agreement, the defendant was required to pay monthly rent on or before the 19th of each calendar month. The plaintiff refers to Clause 15 of the rental agreement, which confers upon both parties the right to terminate the tenancy by issuing one month’s prior written notice. The plaintiff contends that he intended to sell the suit property and, in this regard, requested t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.