KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ANU SIVARAMAN, K. MANMADHA RAO, JJ
SMT GANGANARASAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
MR K A EDMONDS S/O LATE F.P. EDOMONDS – Respondent
Regular First Appeal No. 831 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal is based on a compromise between the parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. court observations regarding the parties' statuses and the effect of the compromise. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. final decisions on the terms of the compromise and procedural undertakings. (Para 5 , 6) |
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel appearing on either side submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties and that the terms of the compromise has been reduced to writing and an application is filed in this regard before this Court.
2. It is submitted that respondent No.2 is not a necessary party in this appeal since respondent No.2 has already alienated the property in favour of the appellants herein. In the above view of the matter, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with.
3. The compromise petition is taken on record.
4. Three demand drafts drawn in favour of respondent No.1 is handed over by the appellants in Court today. The receipt of the demand draft is duly acknowledged. In the above view of the matter, the compromise entered into between the parties is recorded. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in-
terms of the compromise.
5. Registry shall draw up the decree in accordance with the compromise.
6. The original documents which are produced in the suit that are marked by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 shall be handed over to the appellants on proper identification after replacing them with authenticated copies.
7. Court fee shall be refunded in accordance with law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.