SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18547

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ANU SIVARAMAN, K. MANMADHA RAO, JJ
SMT GANGANARASAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
MR K A EDMONDS S/O LATE F.P. EDOMONDS – Respondent
Regular First Appeal No. 831 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. MOHAMED KHAN A.
For the Respondents: SRI. N.K.MALLIKARJUN, SRI. SAMPATH A.

A court may dispose of an appeal based on a compromise reached between the disputing parties, acknowledging the settlement terms and addressing procedural implications.

Headnote:The appeal concerns a compromise reached between the parties regarding claims over property, leading to the dismissal of the appeal in terms of the compromise. The court noted a concession regarding respondent No.2's role in the proceedings and acknowledged the receipt of monetary drafts as part of the settlement. The court ordered the registry to prepare the decree according to the terms of the compromise and stated that the original suit documents should be returned to the appellants.

Table of Content
1. the appeal is based on a compromise between the parties. (Para 1)
2. court observations regarding the parties' statuses and the effect of the compromise. (Para 2 , 4)
3. final decisions on the terms of the compromise and procedural undertakings. (Para 5 , 6)

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

Learned counsel appearing on either side submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties and that the terms of the compromise has been reduced to writing and an application is filed in this regard before this Court.

2. It is submitted that respondent No.2 is not a necessary party in this appeal since respondent No.2 has already alienated the property in favour of the appellants herein. In the above view of the matter, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with.

3. The compromise petition is taken on record.

4. Three demand drafts drawn in favour of respondent No.1 is handed over by the appellants in Court today. The receipt of the demand draft is duly acknowledged. In the above view of the matter, the compromise entered into between the parties is recorded. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in-

terms of the compromise.

5. Registry shall draw up the decree in accordance with the compromise.

6. The original documents which are produced in the suit that are marked by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 shall be handed over to the appellants on proper identification after replacing them with authenticated copies.

7. Court fee shall be refunded in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top