KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, K S HEMALEKHA, JJ
AMIT S/O HIRALAL HANCHATE – Appellant
Versus
SANGMESH S/O. CHANBASAPPA BASARAGI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimant suffered injuries in an accident. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding compensation adequacy. (Para 4 , 5) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)
2. The appellant preferred MVC No.1439/2016 before the Tribunal, seeking compensation of Rs.20,00,000/-. The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.1,51,250/- with interest at the rate of
3. The injury suffered by the claimant in the accident and the liability of the Insurance Company/respondent No.2 to pay the compensation are not in serious dispute, as the Insurance Company has not challenged the judgment and award.
5. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has contended that the Tribunal having taken into consideration all the relevant materials and appreciating the evidence on record, awarded a just and reasonable compensation to the claimant and it does not require any modification. Accordingly, he sought to dismiss the appeal.
7. The material on record reveal that the appellant sustained diffuse cerebral edema, fracture of nasal bone, fracture of right iliac crest-wing, fracture shaft of right femur,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.