Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P.SANDESH, J
SMT. MUMTAZ UNNISA W/O LATE T S KHALEEM ULLA – Appellant
Versus
G R S RAVISHANKAR S/O G R SAMBASHIVAIAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute on agreed terms of tenancy and claims of unpaid rent. (Para 3) |
| 2. trial court's findings supporting landlord's claim for possession and arrears. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. assessment of legality of tenancy termination and tenant's obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling dismissing the appeal. (Para 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff/
3. The defendants appeared and filed the written statement denying the plaint averments and stated that the monthly rent was enhancing from time to time from agreement dated 02.08.2012 and the defendants are continuing in possession of the suit schedule property and also paid enhanced rent of Rs.36,000/- up to date and lease period is for five years and as per the agreement, four years is remaining. But the plaintiff has not produced the agreement in order to show the same and created a new document. Even though the defendants have paid up to date rent to the plaintiff, the plaintiff suddenly issued the notice for evicting and hence, filed a suit in O.S.No.308/2020. Defendants are in due of three months rent to the plaintiff and the plaintiff is in the habit of collecting the rent by cash in the bu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
