Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SRI HARSHITH G.T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY SHO DABASPETE POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. registered fir details and initial charges. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. incident details leading to the assault. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's conclusion on the bail request. (Para 16) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. During the course of investigation, first informant Jaikumar, who was admitted in the hospital had subsequently died on 22.01.2025, thereafter offence punishable under Section 103 (1) of BNS , 2023 was invoked in the present case.
17.05.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court.
7. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader has opposed the petition. She submits that there are eyewitnesses to the incident in question and accordingly prays to dismiss the petition.
22.01.2025 while undergoing treatment.
10. According to the charge sheet allegations, accused No.2/petitioner had a transaction relating to some property with C.W.4 who is the brother-in-law of petitioner herein. C.W.4 Shivakumar was due to pay a sum of Rs.17,00,000/- to accused No.2 and accused No.2 had initiated a Cheque bounce case as against C.W.4 Shivakumar.
12. It is further alleged in the charge sheet that thereafter acc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
