SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 18917

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P.SANDESH, J
THIRUMALA BABU – Appellant
Versus
SRI. KANTEERAVA NARASIMHARAJA SPORTS CLUB – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SAMARTHA S.
For the Respondents: SRI. N.K.RAMESH

Table of Content
1. necessity for trial to ascertain facts in disputed cases. (Para 12 , 14)
2. rejection of plaint requires evidence; improper invocation of rejection rules by trial court. (Para 17 , 18)

ORAL JUDGMENT

2. These two appeals are filed against the order passed by the Trial Court in O.S.No.295/2020 dated 11.12.2020 and O.S.No.265/2021 dated 16.07.2021, respectively in allowing the I.A. filed under Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (d) read with Section 151 of CPC for rejection of the plaint and confirmation of the said order by the First Appellate Court.

4. In both the suits i.e., O.S.No.295/2020 and O.S.No.265/2021, similar grounds are urged. The respondent herein filed an application before the Trial Court under Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (d) read with Section 151 of CPC contending that there is no cause of action to initiate the suit. The plaintiff has impugned the notice of termination being the cause of action for the suit, which is contrary to the facts of the case, wherein termination order has been passed by defendant No.1. The plaintiff has made only six of the committee members as parties and not all the members and hence the suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top