Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
HUSAINSAB @ KAIF – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's preliminaries and considerations before decision. (Para 2 , 8) |
| 2. details of the criminal act and events surrounding the case. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments from both parties regarding the petition for bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. decision-making based on evidence insufficiency and similarities in previous bail grants. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The petitioners/accused Nos.8, 9 and 10 have filed this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., [483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023] to grant bail in Crl.Misc.No.5233/2025, pending on the file of learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad sitting at Hubballi in connection with Old Hubballi P.S. Crime No.300/2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 103 , 61(2), 109, 115(2), 126(2),351(2), 351(3), 352 R/w Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS , 2023’).
On 30.12.2024 at about 07:35 p.m., near Ghodake plot, Mother Theresa School, accused Nos.1 to 3 took quarrel with the complainant’s son by name Sameer Shaik in respect of the incident which had taken place on 29.12.2024 and hence, they abused him in filthy language and intentionally insulted him and with an intention of caus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
