Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA, J
SANTOSH S/O BASVARAJ PUJARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction for specified offences was maintained as per evidence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. first appellate court confirmed lower court's ruling. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented about leniency and severity of sentences. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. court observations regarding injury classification and reasons for acquittal. (Para 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. court ruling aimed at balancing punishment with reasonable fines. (Para 14 , 15 , 18) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
Heard Sri Sangoli Naganna and Smt.Shridevi B.Alba, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Smt.Arati Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent.
2. Revision petitioners are the accused persons who have suffered an order of conviction in C.C No.20/2018 on the file of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vijayapura, and sentenced as under:
“Acting u/Sec 248(2) of Cr.P.C. the A-1 and A-2 are convicted and sentenced as under:
For the offence punishable u/Sec.323 of IPC, they are sentenced to undergo S.I. for 6 months and with a fine of Rs.500/- in default of payment of fine amount, they shall undergo further simple imprisonment for one month.
For
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
