Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J
SMT NETHRAVATHI V S – Appellant
Versus
SRI K BABU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for stay due to previous legal actions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. establishment of gifting under registered deed. (Para 3) |
| 3. dismissal due to lack of merit. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. temporary injunction rules outlined. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's decision to dismiss the appeal. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant has filed this appeal seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 22.03.2025 passed by the XLIV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH-45) in O.S.No.4809/2024, wherein the application filed by the appellant/plaintiff in the shape of I.A.No.1 filed under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC was discussed, seeking an ad interim order of stay, staying the further proceedings pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 09.03.2022 passed by the LXIV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-65) in OS.No.2309/2020 till disposal of the suit.
2. The learned trial Court, considering I.A.No.1, dismissed the same disbelieving the possession of the plaintiff. It is observed by the learned trial Court that, the plaintiff is claiming his right based on agreement of sale dated 12.05.1983.
3. The documents produced by the defendant estab
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
