Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
HEMANTH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
FAIZUL BAQUIYATH ISLAMIC WELFARE TRUST – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the petition and procedural issues in civil litigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on applications for further evidence and responses from parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of electronic evidence and timeline for trial. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard Dr. Amit Anand Deshpande, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri S. Ismail Zabiulla, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the concerned Court i.e., a common order on all the three applications is on the face of it erroneous in law. What the petitioner is wanted to produce was the photo copies of which had already been placed before the Court. The originals were sought to be placed now and on the photographs so filed, the petitioner wanted to continue examine himself in examination-in-chief. All these comes to be rejected is an error, is the submission of the learned counsel.
6. The afore-narrated facts would render the subject petition in a narrow compass. The order that drives the petitioner is rejecting applications I.A.Nos.16 to 18 filed under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the CPC . The order re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
