Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MOHAMMED HANEEF – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4625 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks quashing of fir, claimed allegations are unfounded. (Para 1) |
| 2. the fir lacks necessary ingredients, indicating a civil dispute. (Para 2 , 3) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioners seeks the following relief:
"Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that the Honorable Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR and Complaint in Crime No.16/2025 registered by Respondent Bantwala rural police station, for the alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 329(3), 351(2), 352, 74 of BNS , 2023 pending in the file of Hon'ble Court of Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) & JMFC Court in the interest of justice."
Respondent No.2 served and unrepresented.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that respondent No.2/defacto complainant filed an impugned complaint dated 17.02.2025 registered as an FIR in Cr.No.16/2025 for alleged offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 329(3), 351(2), 352, 74 of BNS , 2023.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
