SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 19540

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
KUMARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI RAVI R.
For the Respondents: SRI RANGASWAMY R.

Table of Content
1. bail consideration based on duration of custody. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. hearing of counsel for admission of bail. (Para 2)
3. conditions set by court for bail. (Para 5)

ORAL ORDER

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. Allegations against the accused persons in the present case is that first informant Swamygowda, who is a charge sheet witness in S.C. No.5033/2019 was allegedly threatened by the accused in the present case on 02.03.2022 when he came to the Court to give evidence. It is in this background, FIR was registered against accused Nos.1 and 2 for the aforesaid offences. The petitioner, who was arrested in the present case, is in custody from 29.06.2022 onwards. The maximum punishment for the charge sheeted offence is imprisonment for a period of seven years. The petitioner is in custody in the present case for the last more than three years. Under the circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, solely on the ground of petitioner's incarceration, his prayer for grant of bail needs to be answered affirmatively.

(i) The petition is allowed.

(a) Petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top