Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
SMT. SUNITA W/O MANOHAR NAGARAHALLI, REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER, CHANNAPPA S/O GUNDAPPA KARAMUDI – Appellant
Versus
KALAKAPPA S/O GUNDAPPA KARAMUDI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim of share in ancestral property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. defendant's execution of agreements impacts plaintiff's claims. (Para 8) |
| 3. legal agreements with defendant 3 outweigh the plaintiff's injunction request. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) This appeal is filed by the plaintiff, questioning the order dated 22.10.2024, passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ron, in O.S.No.90/2024, on I.A.No.1 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, thereby, the prayer for the relief of temporary injunction is dismissed.
3. For the purpose of convenience and easy reference, ranking of the parties is referred to as per their status before the trial Court.
5. Further, the plaintiff pleaded that the defendants No.1 and 2 have entered into agreement of sale dated 13.03.2023 in respect of 01 acre of land in Sy.No.158/3 out of total extent of 08 acres 13 guntas. Further, defendants No.1 and 2 have executed an agreement of lease for 03 acres 25 guntas in the said land. Therefore, pleaded that when the plaintiff is having inherent right of share of 1/3rd in the suit schedule properties, therefore, filed a suit for p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
