Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
SMT. SUNITA W/O MANOHAR NAGARAHALLI, REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER, CHANNAPPA S/O GUNDAPPA KARAMUDI – Appellant
Versus
KALAKAPPA S/O GUNDAPPA KARAMUDI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim of share in ancestral property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. defendant's execution of agreements impacts plaintiff's claims. (Para 8) |
| 3. legal agreements with defendant 3 outweigh the plaintiff's injunction request. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) This appeal is filed by the plaintiff, questioning the order dated 22.10.2024, passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ron, in O.S.No.90/2024, on I.A.No.1 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, thereby, the prayer for the relief of temporary injunction is dismissed.
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsels appearing for both the sides and perused the material placed before the Court.
3. For the purpose of convenience and easy reference, ranking of the parties is referred to as per their status before the trial Court.
4. The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition and separate possession by metes and bounds contending that the suit schedule properties are the ancestral and joint family properties by claiming 1/3rd share in all the suit schedule properties. The plaintiff is the daughter of defendants No.1 and 2.
5. Further, the plaintiff pleaded that the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
