Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
D. NOOR AHMED S/O. LATE D. MOHAMMED GHOUSE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY. REVENUE SECRETARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. courts can have issues raised only through appropriate suits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. validity challenges of sale deeds require civil proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioners are permitted to file suits under the limitation act. (Para 6 , 7) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: IN WP 105945/2022 A) Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any appropriate writ quashing impugned order passed by Respondent No.2 dated 29-10-2005 in PÀæ/¸ÀASÉå/ªÀÄÄzÁæAPÀ/P-45.J(1)/§¼Áîj/78/2001-02 vide ANNEXURE-E and memo issued by Respondent No.2 dated 09-03-2012 in ¸ÀASÉå/f£ÉÆÃ/45.J(1)/ªÀÄÄzÁæAPÀ/§¼Áîj/78/2001-12 vide ANNEXURE-F and the copy of the certificate dated 19-03-2012 issued by respondent no.3 vide ANNEXURE-G as the same are voilative of law and principles of natural justice.
B. Pass such other orders/ directions as this Hon’ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of this case in the interest of justice and equity. IN WP 100263/2023 A. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any appropriate writ quashing impugned order passed by Respondent No.2 dated 29-10-2005 in PÀæ/¸ÀASÉå/ªÀÄÄ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
