SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 20301

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
SRI D ARJUN – Appellant
Versus
SMT GANGAMMA W/O. LATE. CHIKKATHIMMAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V B.
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. suit valuation below threshold invalidates appeal. (Para 1)
2. appeal dismissed, with liberty to approach appropriate court. (Para 2)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The valuation of the suit is made below Rs.10,00,000/-. Therefore, the appeal is not maintainable before this Court.

2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 3. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to file appeal before the appropriate Court.

4. Registry to return the certified copy of this order.

5. The appellant is entitled to benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act .

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top