KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SUKKARAYAPATNA POLICE – Appellant
Versus
ANNAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the facts regarding the incident leading to the appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by the state and the amicus curiae. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's evaluation of the evidence and reasoning. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
The State of Karnataka represented by Sakkarayapatna police through State Public Prosecutor, High Court of Karnataka has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal dated 30.11.2019 passed in C.C.No.1069/2014 by the II Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Kadur.
2. The brief and relevant facts leading upto this appeal are as under:
That the accused/respondent was charge sheeted by the Circle Inspector of Police, Kaduru for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 304(A) of IPC and Sections 181 and 196 of Motor Vehicles Act alleging, that on 10.03.2014 at 9.15 p.m., the accused herein, being the rider of the motorbike bearing registration No.KA-18-V-
2471 was driving the motorbike from chikkamangaluru side in high speed in a rash and negligent manner and when he came near Ekkamma Devarakatte, he drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and dashed to another motorbike comin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.