Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
M/S. SOI DESIGN AND CREST LLP – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SINE POWER TECHNOLOGIES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. foundation of petition's arguments regarding document production. (Para 4) |
| 2. court's examination of procedural laws and prior rulings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. outcome of the petition's merit assessment. (Para 8) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners/defendants 1 to 4 are before this Court calling in question an order dated 02-06-2025 passed on I.A.No.2, by the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Court, Bengaluru in Commercial O.S.No.1463 of 2023, whereby the additional documents sought to be produced by the 1st respondent/plaintiff are taken on record.
2. Heard Sri M. Amshuman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri B.N.Ananthanarayana, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows: -
A suit in Commercial O.S.No.1463 of 2023 is instituted by the plaintiff seeking recovery of money. The plaintiff adduces evidence and marks about 18 exhibits on 03-06-2023. Four additional documents are also marked by the plaintiff on 19-06-2024. It appears that an ex-parte judgment and decree is passed against the present defendants on 22-07-2024. As it was an ex-parte judgment, the petitioners preferred two miscellaneous petitions –
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
