SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 20552

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. DILIPRAJ PUKKELLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


CAV ORDER

1. The Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

i. Declare that the action of the Respondents disqualifying and blocking the DINs of the petitioners and preventing the petitioners from filing any document (e-Forms) with the Respondent No.3 through MCA portal through their DIN/DSC No.07590137 & 07590139, as unconstitutional and in violation of the fundamental rights of the Petitioners as guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and

ii. Pass such other/ further order(s) as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice and equity.

iii. Grant such other relief that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to deem fit in the facts of the present case.

2. The petitioners claim to be the directors of M/s Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “M/s Vihaan”) who were appointed as directors in the year 2016. When the company attempted to file its annual returns and statutory filings for the year 2017-18 and 2018-19, a pop-up dialogue box on the official web portal of Respondent No.1-Ministry of Corporate Affairs displayed the message “the Direc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top