Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SRI PRASANNA KUMAR A.N – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court rules on the necessity of bail for the accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of the incident and prior disputes between families. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. conditions and conclusion of bail granted. (Para 8) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Accused No.1 in Crime No.62/2025 registered by Arakere Police Station, Mandya, for the offences punishable under Sections 118(2), 352, 351(2), 76, 115(2) and 3(5) of BNS , 2023, is before this Court under Section 483 of BNS S, 2023, seeking regular bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. FIR in Crime No.62/2025 was registered by Arakere Police Station, Mandya, for the aforesaid offences against the petitioner and his parents based on the first information dated 26.04.2025 received from Chandramma, mother of injured victim A S Raghu. During the course of investigation, petitioner was arrested on 04.06.2025 and subsequently, remanded to judicial custody. His bail application filed before the jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.5196/2025 was rejected on 24.06.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the incident which had taken place earlier to the incident in question,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
