Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
HAJARATALI S/O. RAFIQUESAB KORLALLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of fraudulent transfer raise serious concerns. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. questionable financial evidence undermines bail request. (Para 5) |
| 3. bail denied based on insufficient evidence. (Para 6) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
Accused in Crime No.63/2025 registered by Vidyanagar Police Station, Hubballi Dharwad for offences punishable under Sections 3 18 (2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) read with Section 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. FIR in Crime No.63/2025 was registered by Vidyanagar Police Station, Hubballi Dharwad for the aforesaid offences against the petitioner herein based on the first information dated 06.05.2025 received from Smt.Husnabanu Shirol. Apprehending arrest in the case, petitioner had filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.5351/2025 before the jurisdictional Sessions Court which was rejected on 30.06.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court.
4. Allegation in the first information against the accused is that in respect of immovable property of which the first informant is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
