Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
HAJARATALI S/O. RAFIQUESAB KORLALLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of fraudulent transfer raise serious concerns. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. questionable financial evidence undermines bail request. (Para 5) |
| 3. bail denied based on insufficient evidence. (Para 6) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. Allegation in the first information against the accused is that in respect of immovable property of which the first informant is the absolute owner, a fraudulent sale deed was executed and registered on 19.07.2024 in favour of the petitioner by an unknown lady who had impersonated the first informant. Subsequently, the petitioner has sold the said property in favour of accused No.2.
6. Under the circumstances, I do not find any good ground to entertain this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
