SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 20939

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
RAGUKUMAR S/O SUBHAS DEVARAR – Appellant
Versus
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 104704 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellant: SRI. B N MULIMANI
For the Respondents: SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 AND R2

The court emphasized the need to consider long-serving guest teachers for regularisation before initiating fresh recruitment processes.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ petition for the quashing of a notification for the appointment of guest lecturers, claiming regularisation of service and seeking to avoid redundancy in recruitment process - The court noted the petitioner's long service and ruled that he should be considered for regularisation before fresh recruitment. (Paras 1-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a guest teacher, challenged the legality of a notification calling for fresh interviews for the same posts despite his continuous service and lack of consideration for regularisation.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the petitioner's grievance, directing his continued service until regularisation is considered.

Issues: The main question addressed was the right to consider the petitioner for regularisation before initiating new recruitment processes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's long service should warrant consideration for regularisation, emphasizing the redundancy of hiring anew without reviewing existing staff.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for reliefs. (Para 1)
2. substantial service led to consideration for regularisation. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court directed continuation of services until regularisation. (Para 4)

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

I. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction, 06.05.2025 quashing notification dated bearing no. ASam.ni/adalita/aushi/cr-08/2025-26 dtd 9.05.2025 issued by the respondent no. 2 as per annexure c as illegal and void.

II. Issue a writ of mandamus and declare that the action of the respondent in calling for fresh notification for the appointment of guest lecturers for the next ensuing year, as contrary to law declared in Manish Gupta And Another V/S President Jan Bhagidari Samithi and other vide Annexure B.

III. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to discontinue the services of the petitioners as guest teachers/ lecturers till the regular appointments are made to the said posts as per Annexure D.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite rendering continuous service as Guest Teacher for many years, his case for regularisation has not been considered by the respondents. It is submitted that if his service was to be considered for regularisation, the process of conducting fresh interviews for the same posts would become redundant.

3. There appears to be substance in the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Under such circumstances, the petitioner ought to have been considered for regularisation of the services of the petitioner, so long as he satisfy all other requirements, and after that for the remaining vacancies the respondents counsel have proceeded with a fresh recruitment process.

4. In light of the above observations, the following order is passed:

ORDER

i) The writ petition is allowed.

ii) Respondents are directed to continue the services of the petitioner as Guest Teacher until the process of regularization is duly considered in accordance with law.

iii) The respondents are further directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, subject to his eligibility, as per applicable rules and regulations, and prior to initiating any fresh recruitment to the said posts.

iv) All pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top