Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
M/S. HANRICH TEKNIC PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. MIKARA ORGANIC FARMS PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the procedural requirement for written statement filing and corresponding deadlines are emphasized. (Para 2) |
| 2. the court's observations confirm strict adherence to statutory mandates. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORAL ORDER
“a) Call for the records in Com.O.S.No.238/2023 pending before Hon’ble XI District and Sessions Judge (Dedicated Commercial Court) Bengaluru Rural District, at Bengaluru.
c) Writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and on the circumstances of the case.”
I.A.No.IV under Section 151 of the CPC seeking permission to file their written statement. The concerned Court rejects the application filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of the delay in filing the written statement.
4. The issue stands answered by this Court in the case of IMAGEX TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. , REPRESENT BY ITS DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER VS. GRAINTEC INDUSTRIES, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER reported in 2025 SCC OnLine Kar 1213 . This Court has held as follows:
8. The afore-narrated facts are not in dispute. The link in the chain of events is a matter of record. The issue is, whether the order of the concerned Court rejecting the application filed by the defenda
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
