Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21064
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R DEVDAS, J
SRI T S NAGESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 25438 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. K S NARAYANA SWAMY
For the Respondents: SRI. SESHU V, HCGP
Writ petitions can be withdrawn, leading to formal dismissal without addressing substantive issues.
Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, requesting corrections to the RTC regarding certain land measures. The petitioner withdrew the application, and the court formally dismissed it. The issue laid before the court was whether to allow the requested rectification before the petition's withdrawal. The court upheld the procedural aspect leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural withdrawal of a petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. the petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2) |
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE Constitution of India PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2- THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION AND RESPONDENT NO. 3- AND THE TAHASILDAR (SPL) YELAHANKA TALUK, TO MAKE NECESSARY CORRECTION IN THE COLUM. NO.11 OF THE RTC PERTAINING TO SY NO. 378/6 MEASURING 30 GUNTAS OF BETTAHALASUR VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DTD
13.05.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-P TO THE WRIT PETITION., ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 11.08.2025 to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
