SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21073

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SANGAYYA S/O SHEKHAYYA PUJAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102875 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. VINAYAKA R. BHAT
For the Respondents: SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL

The court granted bail based on the petitioner's age, lack of a criminal record, and the spontaneous nature of the alleged incident, underlining the balance between personal liberty and societal safety.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita, 2023 - Sections 103, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 - Regular bail sought following arrest; allegations of assault resulting in death due to blunt trauma - Maintaining a balance between justice and individual rights; the petitioner has no prior criminal record and was the sole provider for his family - Considerations mentioned include time spent in custody and potential impact on future. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Crime - Nature of the allegations and evidence - While the petitioner contended the incident arose from a moment of provocation, evidence exists regarding the eye witnesses substantiating the account of events leading to the charge. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, aged 20, was arrested following a complaint regarding the death of Mudayya Pujar after an alleged altercation. Initial police reports suggested an instant eruption of violence, where death was attributed to blunt trauma.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the lack of grievous injuries on the deceased and noted that continuous detainment amongst hardcore criminals could adversely affect the petitioner's future.

Issues: The main issues included the nature of the incident and the justifications for the bail request considering the petitioner's profile and the alleged spontaneous nature of the event.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled in favor of granting bail, emphasizing on the petitioner's age, lack of criminal antecedents, and the necessity to balance personal liberty with the state's interest in justice.

Result: Petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of petition for bail and nature of accusations. (Para 1 , 3)
2. petitioner's argument highlighting innocence and context of the crime. (Para 4 , 5)
3. evidence presented regarding the event and its implications. (Para 6)
4. court's reasoning for granting bail based on various considerations. (Para 8)

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

1. Accused in S.C.No.5041/2025 pending before the Court of I Additional Sessions Judge, Dharwad, sitting at Hubli arising out of Crime No.5/2021 registered by Kundgol Police Station, for the offences punishable under Section s 103 , 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita , 2023, is before this Court under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 ( BNSS 2023) seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.5/2021 was registered by Kundgol Police Station, for the aforesaid offences against the petitioner herein based on the first information dated 11.01.2025 received from Lakshmi W/o Mudayya Pujar. During the course of investigation, petitioner was arrested on 11.01.2025. After completing investigation, charge sheet has been filed against him for the aforesaid offences. His bail application filed before the Jurisdictional Sessions Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.5299/2025 was rejected on

09.06.2025. Therefore, he is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is aged 20 years having no criminal antecedents. He is the sole bread winner of the family. The incident has taken place in a spur of moment. Accordingly, prays to allow the petition.

5. Learned HCGP has opposed the petition. She submits that death was as a result of petitioner kicking the testicles of the deceased. There are eye witnesses to the alleged incident. Accordingly, she prays to dismiss the petition.

6. From a reading of the material on record, it appears that house of the petitioner is situated adjacent to the house of the deceased Mudayya Pujar and his sister Prema. It appears that on 11.01.2025, the petitioner had fought with Nagaraj, son of Prema for the reason that Nagaraj had gone near the house of the petitioner to attend the nature call. The parents of Nagaraj along with first informant and her husband Mudayya Pujar tried to intervene when the petitioner and aforesaid Nagaraj were quarrelling with each other. It is alleged that the petitioner after abusing Mudayya Pujar assaulted the him with his hands and also kicked him on his testicles. It is further alleged that the petitioner also assaulted Nagaraj and his mother Prema and thereafter, ran away from the spot. 7. In the alleged incident, Nagaraj and his mother Prema have suffered simple injuries. Mudayya Pujar was immediately shifted from the crime spot to the hospital. But, he was declared brought dead by the doctors in hospital. Post mortem report of the deceased would go to show that he has not suffered any grievous external injuries on his body. In the final opinion regarding cause of death of the deceased, it is mentioned that death was due to blunt trauma to the testicles. Incident in question had taken place after Nagaraj had gone near the house of the petitioner to attend the nature call. When Nagaraj and petitioner were quarrelling with each other, the deceased and his relatives including the parents of Nagaraj tried to intervene and it is alleged that at that time, petitioner had assaulted the deceased with his hands and kicked him on his testicles. It appears that incident in question had taken place in a spur of moment. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the deceased with his hands and legs.

8. The petitioner is aged about 20 years and has no other criminal antecedent. Petitioner is in custody for the last more than 7 months. Continued detention of the petitioner in custody amongst hardcore criminals in jail would have an adverse impact on his future career and prospects. The trial in the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top