Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P. Sandesh, T.M. Nadaf, JJ
DR. BASITH LATEEF K – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to suspension order through writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition claims improper communication regarding suspension. (Para 2) |
| 3. court maintains tribunal's jurisdiction to hear the matter. (Para 3) |
| 4. court refrains from discussing merits, deferring to tribunal. (Para 4) |
| 5. petition concluded with directions for tribunal review. (Para 5) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated
06.05.2025 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘Tribunal), declining to grant impugned suspension order dated 29.04.2025 in No.DPG/BEMVI/BEMNA/HFWS-200FILE/e-1759239 passed by respondent No.2, which is produced as Annexure - A.
2. The main contention of the counsel appearing for the petitioner that the Tribunal has failed to consider the prayer sought before the Tribunal and the same is only for staying of suspension order issued by respondent No.2 on 29.04.2025, which was communicated to the petitioner on 03.05.2025 through his WhatsApp, which is illegal and is in violation of the interim order passed by the Tribunal. The c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
