SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21295

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SYED AMRULLAH MAZHAR
For the Respondents: SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP

ORAL ORDER

The present is filed by Accused Nos.1 to 3 seeking quashing of the proceedings in Crime No.0364/2024.

Today, learned Additional SPP, on instructions, submits that the charge sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that, as per the wound certificate, respondent No.2 has sustained a head injury. In view of the filing of the charge sheet and the nature of the injury sustained by the complainant, no indulgence is warranted at this stage.

Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top