Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
DEEPA R @ PALUR RAMAKRISHNA DEEPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash fir based on claimed possession. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent claims rights based on a license deed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence discrepancies cast doubt on petitioner's claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. indulgence under section 482 is denied due to prima facie evidence of criminality. (Para 11) |
| 5. court dismisses petition, upholding proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 12) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner who is the partner of a firm named as M/s.
Navaskand INC is seeking quashing of the proceedings pending in Crime No. 0161/2025.
2. Respondent No.2/defacto complainant has lodged a complaint alleging that the present petitioner, who was a total stranger to the premises, without any authority, trespassed into the disputed property, forcibly broke open the locks of the shutter, and threatened the security personnel stationed there. Based on this written complaint, the jurisdictional police registered Crime No.0161/2025 for the offences punishable under Sections
329(4) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The petitioner seeks quashing of the said proceedings on the ground that he has acquired possessory rights over the premises through one Smt. Jaya
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
