SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22212

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
SHREYAS KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10334 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. M. KRISHNE GOWDA
For the Respondents: MS. ASMA KOUSER

Bail can be granted when the risk of tampering with evidence is minimal, even in serious charges, provided conditions ensure compliance.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 - Sections 64(2)(m), 78 and 137(2) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012 - Sections 5(j), 5(l), 6, 11(iv) and 12 - Bail - Petitioner, accused of sexual assault against minor, seeks bail after victim denies allegations - Court finds no risk of tampering with witnesses as trial is in progress and victim has been examined. (Paras 6, 7, 8, 9)

(B) Bail considerations - Pre-trial custody and conditions to prevent tampering - Accused in custody since 15.9.2024 and victim evidence recorded - Conditions imposed to ensure compliance with court directives and prevent interference in the trial. (Paras 7, 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested for a sexual assault case involving a minor. Post-investigation, charges were filed, but the victim denied the allegations. The court examined the situation considering the victim's testimony and length of pre-trial detention.

Findings of Court:
It was determined that further detention could lead to a pre-trial conviction and thus granted bail under certain conditions to mitigate potential risks.

Issues: The main question addressed was the risk of tampering with evidence and the validity of the victim's changing testimony.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that since the victim's evidence had been recorded, the possibility of tampering was minimal, allowing bail to be granted with conditions to ensure process integrity.

Result: Petition allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail with specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. order for bail with conditions. (Para 1)
2. allegations of sexual assault by petitioner against minor. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. victim denies the prosecution's case. (Para 6)
4. arguments on bail conditions and potential risk. (Para 7 , 8)
5. court's reasoning for granting bail. (Para 9)

ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner, learned Addl. SPP for respondent No.1-State and perused the material on record.

2. Learned Addl. SPP has filed a memo along with police report for having served notice on respondent No.2.

The same is placed on record.

3. Petitioner was arrested on 15.9.2024 in connection with a case registered in Cr.No.363/2024 by Girinagar Police Station, Bengaluru City.

4. FIR is registered on a complaint lodged by the victim, a minor girl aged about 17 years, against the petitioner for offence punishable under Section 6 4(2)(m) and 78 of BNS, 2023 and under Section 5(j), 5(l), 6, 11(iv) and 12 of POCSO, 2012.

5. On completion of investigation, chargesheet is filed for offences under Section 6 4(2)(m), 78, 137(2) of BNS, 2023 and under Section 5(j), 5(l), 6, 11(iv) and 12 of POCSO, 2012.

6. It is the case of prosecution that, petitioner herein by inducing the victim stating that he is in love with her, committed penetrative sexual assault as a result of which she became pregnant.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made available a copy of deposition dated 25.7.2025 of the victim/CW1 examined as PW1. He contended that the victim has completely denied the case of prosecution and therefore, further detention of the petitioner will amount to pre-trial conviction. He submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody from 15.9.2024 and therefore, by imposing any condition, he may be enlarged on bail.

8. Learned Addl. SPP submits that trial is in progress and therefore, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail he may tamper with the prosecution witnesses and flee from justice.

9. Petitioner was arrested on 15.9.2024. He is in custody since then. Victim’s evidence is already recorded. Her evidence though cannot be appreciated at this stage, however, considering that the victim has been examined and question of tampering the said material witness does not arise, relief sought by the petitioner can be granted, by imposing suitable conditions.

ORDER I. Petition is allowed.

II. Petitioner/accused No.1 in Crime No.363/2024 of Girinagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, pending in Spl.C.No.2067/2024 on the file of the Court of Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (FTSC-III), Bengaluru City, shall be enlarged on bail, subject to following conditions:

1. He shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only), with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2. He shall furnish proof of his residential address and shall inform the Court, if there is change in the address.

3. He shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

4. He shall not try to contact the victim or intimidate her in any manner.

5. He shall not indulge himself in committing any offence.

6. He shall appear before the trial Court regularly on all dates of hearing.

Violation of condition/s shall result in cancellation of bail. Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top