Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI B S SURESH, SRI. KARTHIKA KUMAR, SMT. NAGARATNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA, M/S BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging acquisition proceedings and rights of petitioners. (Para 2) |
| 2. advocates presented prior case law supporting petitioners' claims. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court mandated decision-making by authorities. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. writ petition results and orders issued. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER
“a. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction and direct the Respondents to consider the Representations submitted by the Petitioners to the Respondent No.2 dated 10.06.2025 at ANNEXURE-A.
b. Declare that the entire Acquisition Proceedings in respect of the Schedule 'B' Properties is abandoned/lapsed in view Section 27 of the BDA Act, 1976 with respect to the Preliminary Notification dated 21.05.2008 bearing No.BDA/COMMR/Deputy Commissioner(LA)/ ALAO/158/2008-09 issued by the Respondent No.2 the Final Notificaiton dated 18.02.2010 bearing No.UDD 51 MNX 2010, gazette dated 18.02.2010 atANNEXURE-E & F issued by respondent No.1.
d. Grant such other reliefs in the interest of Justice and Equity."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an identical prayer is considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.NO.30147/2024, dispose
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
