Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
SRI. NAGESHWAR NARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. ANITHA KUMARI M.S. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner questions family court's dismissal of maintenance application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's financial incapacity and husband's claims are debated. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court assesses the financial conditions and reasons for dismissing the petition. (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
Aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.4 in M.C.
No.2501/2020 dated 10.03.2025 by the V Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, whereby the Family Court had dismissed I.A.No.4 filed by the husband seeking maintenance, the husband is before this Court.
2. The parties are referred to as husband and wife for the sake of convenience.
3. It is the case that the wife had filed I.A.No.2 and the husband had filed I.A.No.4 seeking maintenance to the children. By order impugned, the Family Court had dismissed both the applications. As far as the wife is concerned, she had not questioned the order, but the husband is before this Court questioning the order passed in I.A.No.4. It is the case of the husband that he is taking care of the two children and the wife is staying away from the matrimonial home. It is the case of the husband that he has to take care of the two children and the wife is having su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
