Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
G Basavaraja, J
Fayaz Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case including the nature of the alleged theft. (Para 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 2. discussion on the prosecution's evidence and the necessity of corroborative proof. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. court's conclusion on sufficiency of evidence leading to new conviction. (Para 11) |
ORAL ORDER
The respondent/accused No.2-Fayaz Ahmed has preferred this revision petition against the judgment of conviction and order on sentence 14.11.2017 passed in CC.No.1022/2016 on the file of the I Addl. JMFC, Chitradurga, which is confirmed by the I Addl. District and Session Judge, Chitradurga, in Crl.A.No.85/2017 dated 02.05.2018.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as per on their ranking before the trial Court.
3. The brief facts leading to this revision petition are that, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Chitradurga, has filed a charge sheet against the accused Nos.1 and 2 for the offense under Section 454 and 380 of IPC. On 23.03.2015 at 12.30 p.m. the accused have entered into the house of CW.1, situated in re survey No.70/2 of Medehalli village and lurking of house trespassed into the pump house by breaking open the lock with iron rod and committed a theft of
10 ft
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
