SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22754

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI H N VENKTAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SRI BASAVARAJU – Respondent


-

ORAL JUDGMENT

This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2013 passed in R.A.No.347/2011 by the learned III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Mysore and the judgment and decree dated 07.03.2011 passed in O.S. No.784/2006 by the Learned Principal Judge, Small Causes & Senior Civil Judge, Mysore.

2. For convenience, the parties are referred to, based on their ranking before the Trial Court. The Page No.2 is retyped and replaced vide chamber order dated 22.08.2025 appellant was the defendant No.1, respondent No.1 was the plaintiff, and respondent No.2 was defendant No.2.

-

3. Brief facts, leading rise to the filing of this appeal, are as follows:

(i) The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants for the relief of specific performance of a contract. It is the case of the plaintiff that defendant No.2 allotted the suit site in favour of defendant No.1. Defendant No.1 is the owner in possession of the suit site and he agreed to sell the suit schedule property for a consideration of Rs.7,00,000/- and the sale agreement was executed on 10.10.2005. The plaintiff paid a amount of Rs.5,50,000/- as an advance sale consideration amount, an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top