Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.G.PANDIT, T.M.NADAF, JJ
SHRI JAYAPRAKASH G A – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to articles of charge after suspension revocation. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural compliance with kcsrs. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on timely initiation of charges. (Para 6) |
| 4. ratios concerning the validity of charges issued post-retirement. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final ruling and set aside of previous tribunal order. (Para 9) |
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
The petitioner aggrieved by the order dated
20.08.2024 in Application No.5314/2023 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru (for short, 'the Tribunal'), wherein, the petitioner’s challenge to Articles of Charge dated 30.07.2022 and entrustment of enquiry order dated 14.07.2022 (Annexure - A4) is rejected.
2. Heard Sri.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.V.Shiva Reddy, learned AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.K.Prasanna Shetty, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and perused the entire writ petition papers.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.04.2021. It is submitted that prior to his retirement, he was kept under suspension on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
