SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22784

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI AYAN KUMAR CHOUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

Both these petitions are filed by the accused persons seeking quashing of the impugned complaint and FIR in Crime No.447/2024 filed by the 2nd respondent – de facto complainant for alleged offences punishable under Sections 354 , 354A, 500 and 504 of IPC and for other reliefs.

2. The 2nd respondent – de facto complainant was working as a product manager in General Electric Company from 24.05.2021 onwards and the petitioners are her colleagues also employed in the same company. The 2nd respondent filed the instant complaint which was registered as an FIR in Crime No.447/2024 dated 08.07.2024 against five accused persons. The petitioner in Crl.P.No.9417/2024 is arraigned as accused No.1, while petitioners in Crl.P.No.9042/2024 are arraigned as accused Nos. 2 to 5 respectively.

3. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for 1st respondent – State and learned counsel for 2nd respondent and perused the material on record.

4. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in addition to the impugned complaint and FIR, the 2nd respondent had also instituted proceedings under the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Preventio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top