SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI GANGEERAIAH – Appellant
Versus
CHANNANKAIAH – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2013, passed in R.A.No.145/2008, by the learned Prl. Senior Civil Judge, CJM, Ramanagara, and the judgment and decree dated 14.10.2008, passed in O.S.No.130/2004 by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC, Ramanagara.

2. For convenience, the parties are referred to, based on their rankings before the trial Court. The appellant was the defendant, and the respondent was the plaintiff.

3. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this appeal are as follows:

The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant for a declaration of title and a permanent injunction. It is the case of the plaintiff that the land bearing Sy.No.71 of Tadakavagilu Village, measuring 4 acres 20 guntas, was originally owned by one Ankegowda, who had 5 sons; Chennakaiah, the plaintiff Gangeeriah, the defendant Manarudraiah, Shivarudraiah, and Nagaraja. The above- said persons constituted a Hindu undivided joint family under Mithakshara School of Law. The aforementioned persons divided the property by virtue of a Panchayath Parikath, on 04.06.1979 before the Panchayathdars and succeeded to their respecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top