SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22800

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
PROF. C.M. THYAGARAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner – accused No.2 in C.C.No.1391/2024 arising out of Crime No.103/2020 seeks quashing of the impugned proceedings and for other reliefs.

2. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and perused the material on record. The 2nd respondent – defacto complainant having been served with notice of this petition has chosen to remain unrepresented and has not contested the petition.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the 2nd respondent – defacto complainant filed the instant complaint dated 24.07.2020 interalia alleging that he was working as Assistant Director in Karnataka Vocational Training and Skill Development Corporation Ltd., (KVTSDCL – earlier KSDC) from 20.07.2019 onwards. It was alleged by him that the petitioner herein who was the Executive Director during the period 2014 - 2015 had illegally made / released payments and issued cheques in favour of others towards training expenses and thereby committed offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 IPC . The said complaint was registered as an FIR in Crime No.103/2020 by the 1st respondent – police authorities, who conducted inv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top