SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 21691

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
MR. SANTHOSH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 11478 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI RAJANNA B C
For the Respondents: SRI RANGASWAMY R, HCGP

Accused may be granted bail after a significant material witness turns hostile, especially when in custody for over two years.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - Petitioner is accused No.2 in a murder case involving circumstantial evidence - Witness CW.22 has turned hostile, which is a significant factor - Considering the duration of time in judicial custody (over 2 years) and the assessment of the material witness, bail is granted subject to specific conditions. (Paras 4, 5, 8, 9)

(B) Burden of proof on prosecution - There are no eyewitnesses; hence, case relies on circumstantial evidence - The hostile witness's testimony impacts the prosecution's case. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested on allegations of murder involving circumstantial evidence and claims of a material witness who turned hostile after examination.

Findings of Court:
Given the new developments concerning the material witness and the extended time in custody, bail is warranted under stipulated conditions.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioner could obtain bail after the examination of a significant witness who has turned hostile.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that a significant material witness has turned hostile, along with the lengthy period of judicial custody, warrants granting bail while imposing conditions to ensure compliance. The determination underscores the prosecution's reliance on circumstantial evidence and lack of eyewitness accounts.

Result: Petition is allowed; bail granted.

Table of Content
1. accused is in custody for two years. (Para 2 , 3)
2. previous bail application dismissed, new evidence considered. (Para 4 , 5)
3. prosecution's reliance on circumstantial evidence. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's rationale for granting bail under conditions. (Para 8)

ORAL ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned HCGP for the State and perused the material on record.

2. Petitioner is arraigned as accused No.2 in Crime No.358/2023 of Kengeri Police Station, pending before the learned LVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-

57) in SC No.1921/2023.

3. Petitioner along with accused No.1 is alleged to have committed the murder of one Chetan.V, by dropping a big stone on his head, on the night intervening 08.08.2023 and 09.08.2023. Petitioner was arrested on

10.08.2023. He is in judicial custody.

4. This is a successive bail petition filed by the petitioner. He had preferred Crl.P.No.13772/2023 before this Court seeking bail. The said petition along with Crl.P.No.13910/2023, preferred by accused No.1, was dismissed by a common order dated 18.01.2024. Liberty was reserved to move the Sessions Court afresh for bail, after examination of CW.22, since it was submitted by the prosecution that the said witness is a material witness, who had seen the deceased in the company of the accused, prior to the incident.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that CW.22 has been examined before the trial Court, but completely denied the prosecution case and therefore, the petitioner who is languishing in judicial custody from 10.08.2023, i.e., for more than 2 years may be enlarged on bail by imposing any conditions.

6. Learned HCGP opposed the prayer and sought to reject the petition contending that the trial is in progress and at this stage, if the petitioner is granted bail, he may flee from justice and tamper other prosecution witnesses. He contended that blood stained cloths were recovered at the instance of the petitioner.

7. There are no eyewitnesses to the incident. Entire case is based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution has mainly relied on the statement of CW.22, who is alleged to have seen the deceased and accused together on 08.08.2023 at about 10 p.m. near one Sree Brahmalingeshwara Juice and Condiments where they purchased cigarettes.

8. This Court while dismissing the petition seeking bail, considering that CW.22 is a prime witness, reserved liberty to the accused to move the Sessions Court afresh after his examination, to rule out the possibility of influencing the said witness. It is not in dispute that CW.22 has been now examined by the trial Court. It is the contention of learned counsel for petitioner that the said witness has totally turned hostile. Though his evidence cannot be discussed or appreciated in this petition, however, considering that the material witness has been examined and the petitioner is in judicial custody for more than 2 years, by imposing necessary conditions relief sought in the petition can be granted. Hence, the following:

ORDER Petition is allowed.

Petitioner/accused No.2 in Crime No.358/2023 of Kengeri Police Station, pending in S.C.No.1921/2023 on the file of LVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-57), shall be enlarged on bail, subject to following conditions:

1. He shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2. He shall furnish proof of his residential address and shall inform the Court, if there is change in the address.

3. He shall not leave the jurisdiction of trial Court without prior permission of the learned Sessions Judge.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top