SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22620

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
AFSAR AYUB – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: GIRISH KUMAR B.M.
For the Respondents: ANOOP KUMAR

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case including allegations and proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's grounds for quashing the charge sheet. (Para 4)
3. judicial reasoning on the applicability of acquittal to the petitioner. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's decision to quash on the basis of lack of merit. (Para 7)

ORAL ORDER

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 - State.

4. The present petition is filed seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings on two distinct grounds. Firstly, the petitioner has relied upon the judgment rendered in S.C. No.65/2022 , wherein his brother, who is the husband of respondent No.2 along with the other family members, have been acquitted by judgment and order of acquittal dated 24.12.2024. Secondly, the petitioner has also placed on record a copy of the settlement entered into in Criminal Miscellaneous No.634/2020, wherein the marriage between accused No.1 (husband of respondent No.2) and respondent No.2 came to be dissolved and accused No.1 paid a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards full and final alimony.

6. If accused No.1 - the husband of respondent No.2 against whom the allegations were most direct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top