Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M G UMA, J
SOMALU S/O THAKARU PAWAR, HEMU @ PAPPU S/O LALU RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek bail under allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court reviews materials and evidence. (Para 3) |
| 3. facts indicate absence of eyewitness testimony. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court denies bail based on evidence insufficiency. (Para 6) |
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA)
The petitioners being accused Nos.1 and 2 are before this Court, seeking grant of bail under Section 483 of BNS S, 2023 in Crime No.65/2025 of Wadi Police Station, Chittapur Circle, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103 (1) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’), pending on the file of the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) and JMFC, Chittapur, Kalaburagi.
2. Heard Sri Syed Mastan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Gopalkrishna B. Yadav, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
Perused the materials on record.
3. In view of the rival contentions urged by the learned counsel for both the parties, the point that would arise for my consideration is:
Whether the petitioners are entitled for grant of bail under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023?
My answer to the above point is in the ‘Negative’ for the follow
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
