SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 23341

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SRI. SIDDALINGAPPA @ ANIL S/O MALLAPPA ABBIGERI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. LAXMAN C. KULKARNI
For the Respondents: SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH

Table of Content
1. court directed notice to be taken for the respondent. (Para 1)

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

2. The petitioner is before this Court under Section

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed the petition.

7. So far as the offence punishable under Section

ORDER

(ii) The entire proceedings in C.C. No.2234 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top