KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R DEVDAS, J
MRS. REETA A. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks protection of property possession. (Para 2) |
| 2. court emphasizes civil court jurisdiction for land disputes. (Para 3) |
ORAL ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.
2. The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to restrain them from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petition schedule property and to ensure that they do not dispossess the petitioner from the land in question. It is the contention of the petitioner that he has purchased a residential site bearing No.13, BBMP Khatha No.299/7 measuring 3500 square feet under a registered sale date dated 23.07.2021 at Annexure-A.
3. Learned High Court Government Pleader raises an objection that firstly the petitioner has purchased a residential site and she claims that there is a katha registered in the office of the BBMP. This Court is concerned with the matters arising out of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and not provisions of the BBMP Act or the new Greater Bengaluru Authority Act (for short ‘GBA Act’). Moreover, the prayer sought by the petitioner from dispossession cannot be sought before this Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.