KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI. VINOD ALVA – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondents' justification for application denial. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's application for land use change. (Para 3) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayers:
"a) Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the impugned endorsement bearing NO BEN A PRA / NA YO SA / DLP-10/2021-22/1303/2025-26 dated 17/06/2025, passed by Respondent No.2 Vide ANNEXURE- M declaring the same as void, arbitrary, Illegal, without jurisdiction and inappropriate in law.
b) Issues a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No 2 to reconsider the application of the petitioner for change of land use dated 01/12/2021 and take appropriate decision / pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible c) Pass such other writ/s, direction/s, order/s as deemed fit to pass under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Heard Sri.Vinod Kumar M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri.M.Rajkumar, learned AGA appearing for respondent No.3 and have perused the material on record.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.