SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 23811

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
LAIK AHMED @ LUCKY S/O RASHEED AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10746 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT. MADHUMALATHI S.
For the Respondents: MISS. ASMA KOUSER, SRI. PRAVEEN S.L.

Bail granted based on absence of tampering risk, emphasizing judicial balance between rights of the accused and integrity of legal process.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 4, 6 - Bail application - Accused charged with aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor - Court finds that material witnesses have been examined and allows bail with conditions - Ensures the accused will not tamper with evidence. (Paras 1, 3, 6)

(B) Criminal Justice - The court emphasized the importance of protecting the judicial process while ensuring rights of the accused - Given the circumstances, bail was granted with specific conditions to avoid any interference with the ongoing proceedings. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of a serious offence where he and another individual allegedly committed aggravated sexual assault on a minor girl under false pretenses. The case arose after the victim was reported missing and subsequently found. The prosecution witnesses have been examined, and both witnesses turned hostile.

Findings of Court:
The court determined there was no imminent threat of tampering with evidence, as significant witnesses had already been examined, allowing bail while setting strict conditions.

Issues: Whether the accused could be granted bail without tampering with evidence and considering the nature of the accusations against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled in favor of bail, noting that material witnesses had been examined, while emphasizing the necessity of conditions to prevent interference in ongoing legal proceedings.

Result: Petition allowed, bail granted subject to conditions.

Table of Content
1. bail petition for aggravated sexual assault discussed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. witnesses contradict previous statements. (Para 4)
3. court addresses risks of evidence tampering. (Para 5 , 6)

ORAL ORDER

1. Petitioner/accused No.1 has preferred this petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘ BNSS ’ for short) to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.184/2025 of Kengeri Police Station, Bengaluru City, pending on the file of the Court of Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, FTSC-V at Bengaluru in Spl.C.No.1090/2025.

2. Accused Nos.1 and 2 are alleged to have committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor girl, inducing her that they will provide her a job of a beautician. Based on the statement of victim's mother, case was initially registered under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNS’ for short), as the victim girl was found missing from the house from 16.04.2025. On securing her, statement was recorded by the Police as well as by the learned Magistrate and her medical examination was conducted.

3. Charge sheet is filed against accused Nos.1 and

2 for the offence punishable under Section 351(3), 65(1), 137(2) of the BNS, 2023, Section 4 (2) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘POCSO’ for short).

4. Petitioner was arrested on 19.04.2025. He is in judicial custody. Victim and her mother have been examined by the Trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that both the said witnesses have turned hostile and they have denied the prosecution case.

The copies of their deposition are furnished.

5. Learned Additional SPP contended that if the petitioner is granted bail, he may tamper with the evidence and try to influence other prosecution witnesses who are yet to be examined.

6. The victim and her mother are already examined by the Trial Court. Even though their evidence cannot be appreciated by this Court, in this petition seeking bail, the fact remains that the material witnesses are already examined and therefore, question of tampering them will not arise. Accused No.2 is said to be on bail. Petitioner has undertaken to furnish adequate surety to ensure his regular presence before the Trial.

Hence, imposing necessary conditions, relief sought in the petition can be granted. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

i) Petition is allowed ii) Petitioner/Accused No.1 in Crime No.184/2025 of Kengeri Police Station pending in Spl.C.No.1090/2025 on the file of Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, FTSC-V, Bengaluru of Kengari Police Station, Bangalore, shall be enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:

1. He shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), with two sureties for the likesum out of which one surety shall be a local surety, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2. He shall furnish proof of his residential address and shall inform the Court, if there is change in the address.

3. He shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

4. He shall not indulge himself in committing any offence.

5. He shall appear before the Trial Court regularly on all dates of hearing.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top