KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
SMT ADILAKSHMAMMA W/O MALLESHAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MUDDARANGAMMA W/O CHIKKATHIMMAIAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing and challenge of applications under cpc. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's stance on will execution doubts. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. regulation of legatee's status and will proof. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. direction for prompt appeal resolution. (Para 7) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Though these appeals are listed for admission, with consent of both the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matters are taken up for final disposal.
2. M.F.A.No.1777/2019 and M.F.A.No.2899/2019 are filed challenging the order dated 03.01.2019 passed on I.A.No.17 and I.A.No.1 in R.A.Nos.115/2001 and 122/2001 respectively by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, whereby the applications filed under Order XXII Rule 4 r/w. Order XXII Rule 10 of CPC came to be dismissed.
3. One Ademma W/o. Siddappa has filed suit for declaration and injunction. The said suit is partly decreed. Against that, the plaintiffs have preferred R.A.No.122/2001 and defendants have preferred R.A.No.115/2001. During pendency of the Regular Appeals, the plaintiff Ademma died. Therefore, the appellant herein has filed application under Order XXII HC-KAR Rule 4 read with Order XXII Rule 10 of CPC praying to implead the appellant her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.