Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
MS. UPASANA RAGHU – Appellant
Versus
SMT. DEEPA VISHWANATHAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial court order regarding insurance amount deposit. (Para 1 , 3 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. disputed claims over legal heirship under insurance policy. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. interpretation of nominee rights versus heirship. (Para 8 , 13 , 15) |
| 4. final decision on deposit and interest reservation. (Para 17) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. M.F.A.No.7994/2024 is filed by the defendant No.3 calling in question the order passed on I.A.No.4 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure in O.S.No.2856/2024 pending on the file of V Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, an order of temporary HC-KAR injunction is granted with a condition that the 3rd defendant shall deposit Rs.4,00,00,000/- (Rupees Four Crores only) to the Court account within 30 days received from the defendant No.2 upon the death claim of late K.C.Raghu accrued under insurance policy No.607405885.
2. M.F.A.No.768/2025 is filed by the plaintiffs No.1 and 2 calling in question the order passed on I.A.No.4 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure in O.S.No.2856/2024 pending on the file of V Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, being aggrieved only so far as the order at clause 3 of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
