Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA, J
SRI H. SRINIVAS PAI S/O LATE HARADI SRIDHAR PAI, SRI H. SATHISH PAI S/O LATE HARADI SRIDHAR PAI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. LATHA HARSHA, SMT. RATHNA HEGGADE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature and requirements of specific performance in property agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. context of dismissal based on lack of evidence and legal sufficiency. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial reasoning regarding unregistered oral agreements in specific performance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final decision affirming lower court dismissals. (Para 13) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. Unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants challenging the decree of dismissal of the suit for specific performance in respect of the following property (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property) in O.S.No.98/2006 confirming in R.A.No.30/2019.
Non-agricultural house site property situated in No.76 Badagabettu Village of Udupi Taluk and in Bailoor Ward (Formerly Volakad Ward) of Udupi City Municipality bearing S.No.93/11B (93/11B1p-1 as per the computerized RTC) - Punja (middle-western portion) measuring about 52 cents and coming within the following Boundaries.
East : Voni or lane
West : Road,
N.B.: The above property with a tilted residential building bearing Udupi Municipal D.No.6- 1-14, about 25 coconut trees and plants, 4 mango trees, 6 jack fruit trees, 2 young teakwood trees, a well with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
