Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S RACHAIAH, J
VASANTHAKUMARI D/O SIDDARAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY TERAKANAMBI P S. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application analysis (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented for and against bail. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments for bail (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's observations on proceedings (Para 8) |
| 5. court's rationale for bail (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. final order and conditions (Para 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. The appellant, who is arraigned as accused No.2 in Crime No.122/2021 of the respondent – Police, is before this Court seeking regular bail for the offences punishable under Sections 3 41, 504, 506 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and Sections 3 (1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Amendment Act, 2015 (for short ‘SC/ST (POA) Act’) and seeking to set aside the order dated 04.11.2024 passed in SPL.C.No.46/2022 passed by the Prl. District and Sessions Judge at Chamarajanagara.
Factual matrix of the case:
2. The case of the prosecution is that, the complainant filed a complaint alleging that, on 15.12.2021, around 06.30 p.m., when the complainant was walking on the left side of the road near the house of Basavamurthy, accused Nos.1 and 2 were going on a bike in a rash and negligent manner, as if they were going to hi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
